LSLaunch SentinelReports
⚡ Early access — every report is free right now.
Home / Reports / Creately 3.0
C
VC Intelligence Report

Creately 3.0

Design — A comprehensive diagramming platform enabling teams to create flowcharts, mind maps, org charts,…
Designsaas
● Stable
Category standing real
50th pctl · Design
19.6
Signal score
0–100 composite · real
#2,586
Category rank
of 5,141 · real
52th
Universe percentile
vs 79,105 modeled · real
86%
Mortality P(dead)
model est. · model est.

Signal trajectory

real

Signal 21.825.2 across 163 readings (+3.4). Composite of press, GitHub velocity, community heat, liveness and funding.

Cross-sectional profile

percentile rank vs 79,105 modeled products
Signal (universe) real
52
Signal (category) real
50
Profile maturity real
99
Tag breadth real
100
Network position sparse
94
Press footprint sparse
0

Percentiles computed over the modeled cohort (embedding + signal + tags). Sparse dimensions — network and press — reflect that most products have zero, so a single edge or mention lifts the rank; read those with the coverage flag.

Mortality outlook

model estimate
86%
P(inactive)
High risk
Higher risk than 78% of the universe.

This is a model estimate, not a verdict. 78,505 of the 79,105 modeled products are unlabeled and scored by the model only.

  • LightGBM · binary mortality (dead vs surviving)
  • Held-out AUC 0.71 · CV AUC 0.79 ± 0.05 · Brier 0.21
  • Trained on 600 verified labels (150 dead / 450 surviving)
  • Leakage-guarded: excludes status, discontinued_year, profile_maturity
  • Top drivers: tag breadth, signal, vintage, liveness, business model

n=600 is thin → 95% CI on AUC ≈ ±0.10. Treat as a directional signal, not a calibrated probability.

Analyst read

generated from the metrics above · no external narrative

Creately 3.0 sits in the 52th percentile of Launch Sentinel's 79,105-product universe by signal, ranked #2,586 of 5,141 in Design. The mortality model puts its probability of going inactive at 86% — a model estimate with a wide confidence band. It sits on the competitive-alternatives graph with 1 linked rival, so the comparable set below leans on curated edges. Signal momentum is roughly flat.

Comparable set

curated alternatives → functional tag-similarity
CompanyBasisSignalP(dead)
Lucidchartdesigncurated18.613%
Collaboardproductivitytag-overlap30.045%
Preziproductivitytag-overlap25.71%
Flourishanalyticstag-overlap18.61%
Feltdesignsimilar32.911%
Figma Team Library 1.0designsimilar18.658%
Prezi Nextproductivitytag-overlap15.761%
Visme Flowchart Makerdesignsimilar32.912%

Confidence reflects source and category coherence: curated = an editorially linked alternative; similar = strong functional tag-overlap in the same category; tag-overlap = shared tags only and may be noisy. Signal & P(dead) are real / model.

Structure

observed attributes
Business modelsaas
Liveness tierquiet
Open sourceNo
Public APINo
Free tierNo
Enterprise tierNo

Funding & team

not in source

No disclosed funding in our sources. Funding data covers only ~1% of the corpus (462 rounds across 79K products), so absence here is unknown, not zero— we don't estimate a number we can't source.