Google Images Search "View Image" Button
Verified live by HTTP probe across 40 observations. Pulse momentum is negative over 30 days (-4.7) — observed activity is receding.
HTTP liveness
realSignal telemetry
4 families · 2 observed · observed onlychromewebstore.google.comedge
direct originserver
ESFTranco rank
unranked
Analyst read
generated from the observed metrics above · no external narrativeGoogle Images Search "View Image" Button's listed site resolved live when we last probed it on Aug 27, 2026, so we mark it verified alive. Its Pulse Index is 40.0 of 100, built from 2 of 4 observed signal families. Observed footprint: 6 functional tags. It sits on the competitive-alternatives graph with 1 linked rival, so the comparable set below leans on curated edges.
Comparable set
curated alternatives → functional tag-similarity| Company | Basis | Overlap | Pulse | 30d Δ | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reverse Image Searchai-tools | curated | — | 40.0 | 0.0 | ● live |
| Bring Google View Image Backdev-tools | tag-overlap | 86% | 8.0 | -32.0 | — unverified |
| URLtoQRCodeproductivity | similar | 86% | 40.0 | 0.0 | ● live |
| Make Google Image Search Great Again!productivity | similar | 83% | 40.0 | 0.0 | ● live |
| Ritualproductivity | similar | 83% | 40.0 | +9.6 | ● live |
| Tic Tac Toegaming | tag-overlap | 71% | 0.0 | 0.0 | ■ inactive |
| Photobucket Hotlink Fixdev-tools | tag-overlap | 71% | 40.0 | 0.0 | ● live |
| A new header photo daily.productivity | similar | 71% | 8.0 | 0.0 | — unverified |
Confidence reflects source and category coherence: curated = an editorially linked alternative; similar = strong functional tag-overlap in the same category; tag-overlap = shared tags only and may be noisy. Overlap is the shared functional-tag ratio (Jaccard) for tag-matched rows. Pulse is the observed-activity index real and 30d Δ its signed month change; a dash means insufficient observed history, never zero.
Structure
observed attributesFunding & team
not in sourceNo disclosed funding in our sources. Funding data covers only ~1% of the corpus (462 rounds across 79K products), so absence here is unknown, not zero— we don't estimate a number we can't source.