LSLaunch SentinelReports
⚡ Early access — every report is free right now.
Home / Reports / Lattice Feedback
L
VC Intelligence Report

Lattice Feedback

Productivity — Give co-workers feedback in the moment [Mac, Web App, Productivity]
Productivitysaasest. 2017
▲ Rising
Category standing real
2th pctl · Productivity
15.7
Signal score
0–100 composite · real
#5,850
Category rank
of 10,124 · real
1th
Universe percentile
vs 79,105 modeled · real
1%
Mortality P(dead)
verified label · real

Signal trajectory

real

Signal 6.19.6 across 26 readings (+3.6). Composite of press, GitHub velocity, community heat, liveness and funding.

Cross-sectional profile

percentile rank vs 79,105 modeled products
Signal (universe) real
1
Signal (category) real
2
Profile maturity real
1
Tag breadth real
86
Network position sparse
99
Press footprint sparse
0

Percentiles computed over the modeled cohort (embedding + signal + tags). Sparse dimensions — network and press — reflect that most products have zero, so a single edge or mention lifts the rank; read those with the coverage flag.

Mortality outlook

verified label
1%
P(inactive)
Low risk
Higher risk than 2% of the universe.

This product carries a verified outcome label (“surviving”) — it is one of 600 hand-labeled cases the model is trained and tested on.

  • LightGBM · binary mortality (dead vs surviving)
  • Held-out AUC 0.71 · CV AUC 0.79 ± 0.05 · Brier 0.21
  • Trained on 600 verified labels (150 dead / 450 surviving)
  • Leakage-guarded: excludes status, discontinued_year, profile_maturity
  • Top drivers: tag breadth, signal, vintage, liveness, business model

n=600 is thin → 95% CI on AUC ≈ ±0.10. Treat as a directional signal, not a calibrated probability.

Analyst read

generated from the metrics above · no external narrative

Lattice Feedback sits in the 1th percentile of Launch Sentinel's 79,105-product universe by signal, ranked #5,850 of 10,124 in Productivity. The mortality model puts its probability of going inactive at 1% — a verified outcome label. It sits on the competitive-alternatives graph with 3 linked rivals, so the comparable set below leans on curated edges. Signal momentum is positive (WoW +58.9).

Comparable set

curated alternatives → functional tag-similarity
CompanyBasisSignalP(dead)
Officevibeproductivitycurated15.722%
15Fiveproductivitycurated15.70%
Culture Ampproductivitycurated22.93%
Remeshcommunicationtag-overlap15.77%
Unytalkcommunicationtag-overlap30.01%
Talk Turkeyproductivitysimilar15.776%
Surflycommunicationtag-overlap22.90%
ithakaai-toolstag-overlap15.765%

Confidence reflects source and category coherence: curated = an editorially linked alternative; similar = strong functional tag-overlap in the same category; tag-overlap = shared tags only and may be noisy. Signal & P(dead) are real / model.

Structure

observed attributes
Business modelsaas
Liveness tierquiet
Open sourceNo
Public APINo
Free tierNo
Enterprise tierNo

Funding & team

not in source

No disclosed funding in our sources. Funding data covers only ~1% of the corpus (462 rounds across 79K products), so absence here is unknown, not zero— we don't estimate a number we can't source.