Receiptify AI
Observed dead: the site no longer answers as a live product. Pulse has been flat over the last 30 days. Observation is liveness-only: no tracked press, repository, or traffic rank — existence is confirmed, momentum is unobserved.
HTTP liveness
realSignal telemetry
4 families · 2 observed · observed onlyreceiptify.aiedge
direct originserver
VercelTranco rank
#4,093,230
Analyst read
generated from the observed metrics above · no external narrativeReceiptify AI's site returned a hard-dead response when we last probed it on Aug 26, 2026, so we mark it inactive. Its Pulse Index is 0.1 of 100, built from 2 of 4 observed signal families. Observed footprint: 5 functional tags. It has no curated competitive-alternative edges yet, so the comparable set below is functional tag-similarity — read it with the confidence flags.
Comparable set
curated alternatives → functional tag-similarity| Company | Basis | Overlap | Pulse | 30d Δ | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assistantai-tools | tag-overlap | 100% | 49.7 | 0.0 | ● live |
| Babel Mailai-tools | tag-overlap | 100% | — | — | — unverified |
| Super.ccproductivity | similar | 100% | — | — | — unverified |
| BookAI.Topeducation | tag-overlap | 83% | 40.3 | 0.0 | ● live |
| New Data Types in Excel (Preview!)productivity | similar | 83% | 40.0 | 0.0 | ● live |
| Memory AI - Betaproductivity | similar | 83% | 16.0 | 0.0 | → redirected |
| CV Scannerai-tools | tag-overlap | 83% | 8.0 | 0.0 | — unverified |
| 1000+ Project Management Promptsproductivity | similar | 83% | 40.0 | 0.0 | ● live |
Confidence reflects source and category coherence: curated = an editorially linked alternative; similar = strong functional tag-overlap in the same category; tag-overlap = shared tags only and may be noisy. Overlap is the shared functional-tag ratio (Jaccard) for tag-matched rows. Pulse is the observed-activity index real and 30d Δ its signed month change; a dash means insufficient observed history, never zero.
Structure
observed attributesFunding & team
not in sourceNo disclosed funding in our sources. Funding data covers only ~1% of the corpus (462 rounds across 79K products), so absence here is unknown, not zero— we don't estimate a number we can't source.