LSLaunch SentinelReports
⚡ Early access — every report is free right now.
Home / Reports / Redact.dev
R
VC Intelligence Report

Redact.dev

Security — A free desktop application that enables bulk deletion of content across social networks and inst…
Securityfree
● Stable
Category standing real
82th pctl · Security
32.9
Signal score
0–100 composite · real
#16
Category rank
of 931 · real
87th
Universe percentile
vs 79,105 modeled · real
15%
Mortality P(dead)
model est. · model est.

Signal trajectory

real

Signal 15.718.2 across 154 readings (+2.5). Composite of press, GitHub velocity, community heat, liveness and funding.

Cross-sectional profile

percentile rank vs 79,105 modeled products
Signal (universe) real
87
Signal (category) real
82
Profile maturity real
87
Tag breadth real
48
Network position sparse
0
Press footprint sparse
99

Percentiles computed over the modeled cohort (embedding + signal + tags). Sparse dimensions — network and press — reflect that most products have zero, so a single edge or mention lifts the rank; read those with the coverage flag.

Mortality outlook

model estimate
15%
P(inactive)
Low risk
Higher risk than 24% of the universe.

This is a model estimate, not a verdict. 78,505 of the 79,105 modeled products are unlabeled and scored by the model only.

  • LightGBM · binary mortality (dead vs surviving)
  • Held-out AUC 0.71 · CV AUC 0.79 ± 0.05 · Brier 0.21
  • Trained on 600 verified labels (150 dead / 450 surviving)
  • Leakage-guarded: excludes status, discontinued_year, profile_maturity
  • Top drivers: tag breadth, signal, vintage, liveness, business model

n=600 is thin → 95% CI on AUC ≈ ±0.10. Treat as a directional signal, not a calibrated probability.

Analyst read

generated from the metrics above · no external narrative

Redact.dev sits in the 87th percentile of Launch Sentinel's 79,105-product universe by signal, ranked #16 of 931 in Security. The mortality model puts its probability of going inactive at 15% — a model estimate with a wide confidence band. It has no curated competitive-alternative edges yet, so the comparable set below is functional tag-similarity — read it with the confidence flags. Signal momentum is roughly flat.

Comparable set

curated alternatives → functional tag-similarity
CompanyBasisSignalP(dead)
Japplis Watchproductivitytag-overlap32.915%
Thunderbird Emailcommunicationtag-overlap38.617%
PDF Studio Viewer - PDF Annotatorproductivitytag-overlap32.927%
Offline Timeproductivitytag-overlap15.775%
Sideroadsproductivitytag-overlap22.969%
Oneproductivitytag-overlap32.918%
Rooster Dayproductivitytag-overlap30.055%
Green Tomatesproductivitytag-overlap18.671%

Confidence reflects source and category coherence: curated = an editorially linked alternative; similar = strong functional tag-overlap in the same category; tag-overlap = shared tags only and may be noisy. Signal & P(dead) are real / model.

Structure

observed attributes
Business modelfree
Liveness tieractive
Open sourceNo
Public APINo
Free tierNo
Enterprise tierNo

Funding & team

not in source

No disclosed funding in our sources. Funding data covers only ~1% of the corpus (462 rounds across 79K products), so absence here is unknown, not zero— we don't estimate a number we can't source.