Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Products/Developer Tools/GitHubActiveVC Report ↗
GitHub

GitHub

Build software better, together

Developer Tools·by GitHub, Inc.·Launched May 2014·0 upvotes·github.com
Visit Website
ALIVEverified Aug 27, 2026 · HTTP 200
CohortClass of 2014

What it is

Build software better, together. [Web App, Developer Tools, GitHub]

HTTP liveness

35 probes since Jun 12
Jun 12Aug 27
AliveHard-dead (404/5xx/parked)RedirectedUnverified (timeout/DNS/block)

Funding history

4 rounds
Total raised
$511.0M
Latest valuation
$300.0M
Stage
seed
Lead investors: Harry Stebbings · Harry Stebbings · Harry Stebbings · Harry Stebbings · Felicis
Seed
Feb 2026
Felicis, Madrona, M12, Basis Set
Valuation: $300.0M
$60.0M
source
Series A
Aug 2015
investors undisclosed
$251.0M
SEC
Seed
Aug 2012
investors undisclosed
$100.0M
SEC
Private
Jul 2012
Andreessen Horowitz
Valuation: $750.0M
$100.0M
source
Data from SEC EDGAR Form D filings and press coverage. Round labels for SEC filings are inferred from filing sequence and amount.

Moat

None apparent

The dossier provides no concrete evidence of a durable competitive advantage such as network effects, proprietary data accumulation, brand premium, switching costs, unique IP, privileged distribution channels, cost-scale advantages, or regulatory barriers. While GitHub offers collaborative, real‑time version‑history features, these capabilities are common among comparable dev‑tools and do not, by themselves, create a defensible moat. The comparable set (MongoDB Atlas, GitLab, PagerDuty, Bitrise) indicates a crowded market with multiple alternatives offering similar functionality, reinforcing the absence of a unique protective mechanism.

Evidence comes from the product tags (collaborative, real‑time, version‑history) and the comparable list, which show that GitHub operates in a space with many similar tools. Press coverage focuses solely on security controversies, offering no indication of brand strength or market dominance. No tags or description mention data accumulation, network‑effect dynamics, proprietary technology, or exclusive distribution that would suggest a moat.

Potential erosion factors include the ease of switching to other dev‑tools with comparable features, the lack of unique data assets, and the exposure to security incidents highlighted in the press. Without a distinctive lock‑in or proprietary advantage, GitHub remains vulnerable to competitive pressure from the listed comparables and new entrants.

  • descriptionNo evidence of network effects, proprietary data, brand premium, switching costs, IP, distribution, cost‑scale, or regulatory barriers.
  • comparablesPresence of multiple comparable dev‑tools (MongoDB Atlas, GitLab, PagerDuty, Bitrise) indicates a crowded market with similar capabilities.
  • tagsTags list collaborative, real‑time, version‑history features but do not denote unique data or lock‑in mechanisms.
  • pressPress headlines focus on security controversies, not on market leadership or brand strength.
0.45 confidence · grounded in 4 sources
Grounded analysis from catalog data, tags, comparables, and press · Jul 2026

Press mentions

5 lifetime · 5 shown
Thu
Aug 6
Hacker News

GitHub Actions and Pages are experiencing degraded availability

githubstatus.com·GitHub reports degraded availability for its Actions and Pages services.
-1.00
Thu
May 21
The Verge

GitHub faces a fight for its survival at Microsoft

theverge.com·GitHub faces multiple outages, security vulnerabilities, and competitive pressure following Microsoft's 2018 acquisition.
-1.00
Thu
May 21
Wired

A Hacker Group Is Poisoning Open Source Code at an Unprecedented Scale

wired.com·TeamPCP hacker group conducts large-scale open source software supply chain attacks affecting hundreds of organizations via GitHub.
-1.00
Wed
May 20
VentureBeat

GitHub confirms 3,800 internal repos stolen through poisoned VS Code extension as supply chain worm hits Microsoft’s Python SDK

venturebeat.com·GitHub confirms attackers stole 3,800 internal repositories through a poisoned VS Code extension, with the threat group UNC6780 demanding $50,000 for the stolen data.
-1.00
Wed
May 20
TechCrunch

GitHub says hackers stole data from thousands of internal repositories

techcrunch.com·GitHub confirms hackers accessed internal repositories but says no customer data was compromised in the breach.
-1.00

Discussion 0 comments

0/1000
Sign in to comment

No comments yet. Be the first!

Pulse Indexobserved activity
442/4 signal families
Liveness40%
1.00
Press30%
0.14
GitHub20%
no data
Tranco10%
no data

Weighted observed activity · updated Aug 26

Founders
Chris Wanstrath
Co-founder
Scott Chacon
Phillip Hyett
Vlado Herman
Cohort survival · Class of 2014weekly

10,235 products launched in 2014 · 99% still active

10,131 active104 sunset
Still active
99%
Median lifespan
4.9y